The Buzz on Genealogy Biographies: Harrison Vaughn - AncientFaces

PER CURIAM. Robert R. Laing, Jr., of Kansas City, for appellants. Jonathan C. Brzon and Richard V. Eckert, of Office of the Shawnee County Therapist, of Topeka, for appellees. Prior To MALONE, C.J., PIERRON and STANDRIDGE, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM. William Harrison Vaughn, Jr., dedicated suicide while put behind bars at the Shawnee County Department of Corrections.

Vaughn, as survivor and the administrator of Vaughn's estate, and likewise K.L.A., Vaughn's survivor, (jointly Estate), submitted suit in Kansas federal district court against the County and also the guards/staff (collectively the DOC). In federal court, the Estate raised violations of Vaughn's rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Changes to the United States Constitution under 42 U.S.

1983 (2000) and also negligence claims under Kansas law. The federal court approved summary judgment to all the defendants other than Donavin Rhone on the federal constitutional claims. See Vaughn v. County Com'rs of Shawnee County, Kan., No. 044083JAR 2005 WL 3087842 (D.Kan. 2005) (unpublished opinion). The Estate had actually filed a separate case in federal court versus Rhone which case was dismissed without prejudice.

Richardson Teacher Creates Costume For Disabled Student – CBS Dallas / Fort  Worth

The 10-Second Trick For Vaughn, Plummer H, Jr – Lewis County TNGenWeb

The Estate submitted the Kansas negligence declares against the DOC in the district court.  headaches from cervical spine  granted summary judgment to the DOC finding all claims were barred by res judicata based on the judgment approved in the federal case. Relating to Rhone, the court held the Rhone owed no task to Vaughn since Rhone did not know or have any reason to know that Vaughn was most likely to do hurt to himself.

For circumstances, in Ruebke v. World Communications Corp., 241 Kan. 595, 738 P. 2d 1246 (1987 ), the complainant's response to a motion for summary judgment contained only general recommendations to the whole trial records. The court promoted the trial court's ruling that the opposing celebration was deemed to have confessed the uncontroverted truths, saying that the rule vests discretion on the trial judge "whose sound discretion will not be disturbed on appeal without a clear showing of abuse.

Harrison Vaughn (@HarrisonVaughn) / Twitter

One who asserts the court has actually abused its discretion bears the burden of showing such abuse of discretion."241 Kan. at 604. Here, the district court that found all but three of the DOC's facts listed in its summary judgment motion were uncontroverted by the Estate and the staying 3 were not sufficiently controverted by the Estate in its action.